Personal Injury Settlements vs. Court Trials: Which Is Right for You?

Glenn Honda | | Personal Injury
Gavel resting on a red law book next to a scroll labeled Personal Injury

When you suffer an injury due to someone else’s negligence, you may face a tough decision: accept a personal injury settlement or pursue a court trial. Each option has pros and cons, and the right choice depends on your personal circumstances, financial priorities, and goals for compensation.

Most personal injury cases, such as car accidents or slip-and-falls, settle out of court. Settlements can cover medical bills, lost wages, and future expenses without the emotional toll of a formal legal proceeding. However, if the settlement offer is too low, going to trial may help you secure fair compensation.

Choosing between a settlement and a court trial involves critical factors, such as legal fees, court costs, and the length of the legal process. An experienced personal injury attorney can guide you through your options, explain the trial process, and help you pursue further compensation if necessary.

This article breaks down personal injury settlements vs. court trials, highlighting their differences, benefits, and risks. By understanding the settlement process and trial verdict outcomes, you can make an informed decision that serves your best interests and helps you receive compensation sooner or through a favorable jury verdict.

The Basics of Personal Injury Settlements

A personal injury settlement is a legal agreement where the injured party accepts compensation from the at-fault party or their insurance company. Most personal injury cases settle before going to trial. Settlements can cover medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. The settlement process usually involves:

  • Filing a personal injury claim: Start by submitting a claim to the insurance company.
  • Gathering medical records and evidence: Prove your injuries and losses.
  • Negotiating a settlement offer: Your personal injury attorney will deal with the insurance company for fair compensation.
  • Signing a settlement agreement: Once both parties agree, you receive the settlement amount.

Settlements help injured parties receive compensation sooner and avoid the risks of a court trial.

Understanding Court Trials in Personal Injury Cases

A personal injury court trial is a formal legal proceeding where a judge or jury decides the outcome of a lawsuit. Going to trial may be necessary if settlement negotiations fail or if insurance companies refuse a reasonable settlement. The trial process typically involves:

  • Filing a lawsuit: Your attorney files a complaint in civil court.
  • Discovery phase: Both sides exchange evidence, including medical records and witness testimony.
  • Trial preparation: Your attorney builds a legal strategy and prepares expert witness testimony.
  • Courtroom representation: Attorneys present arguments, examine witnesses, and submit evidence.
  • Jury verdict: The jury or judge issues a decision, including compensation for damages.

Court trials can lead to more significant compensation awards but involve court costs, legal fees, and emotional tolls.

Pros and Cons of Settling Your Personal Injury Case

Pros of Settling Cons of Settling
Settlements resolve quicker than trials, helping cover medical expenses and lost wages sooner. Settlement amounts are often lower than trial awards.
Avoid court costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees. Once signed, you cannot pursue further compensation.
Settlements avoid the emotional strain of a trial process. Insurance companies may pressure you to accept a low settlement offer.
Settlement terms remain confidential.

Pros and Cons of Going to Trial for Your Personal Injury Case

Pros of Going to Trial Cons of Going to Trial
Jury verdicts often award larger compensation amounts. Trials can take months or years to resolve. It can be stressful and time-consuming.
Trials can hold the at-fault party publicly responsible. You may face attorney fees, expert witness fees, and litigation costs.
If you win, you may also receive punitive damages. Jury decisions are unpredictable, and you could receive no compensation.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Between Settlement and Trial

Judge in courtroom receiving legal documents from attorneys during a case hearing

When deciding between a personal injury settlement and a court trial, consider:

  • Financial priorities: Do you need compensation quickly to cover medical bills and lost wages?
  • Severity of injuries: Severe injuries may justify pursuing a larger compensation award through trial.
  • Legal costs: Trials involve higher court costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees.
  • Risk tolerance: Settlements offer certainty, while trials carry the risk of receiving nothing.
  • Future expenses: Will the settlement cover future medical treatment and long-term care?
  • Emotional impact: Are you prepared for the stress of a lengthy trial process?

Evaluating Your Personal Priorities and Goals

Assessing your personal priorities and goals is an essential step in deciding between settlement and trial. Plaintiffs must evaluate both their immediate financial needs and long-term aspirations to make informed decisions. The emotional strain of litigation can significantly influence your choice. Some plaintiffs may find the prolonged legal process and public scrutiny of a trial too taxing, making a settlement a more appealing option.

Conversely, those seeking a sense of justice and formal acknowledgment of the defendant’s actions may find the transparency and public record of a trial more satisfying.

Consulting with Legal Professionals for Informed Decisions

Businessman in suit filling out legal or financial paperwork at a desk with office tools

An experienced personal injury attorney can guide you through the settlement process and trial options. They will:

  • Assess the settlement offer and potential trial outcomes.
  • Compare settlement amounts to potential jury verdicts.
  • Manage settlement talks with insurance companies.
  • Build a legal strategy and present evidence if necessary.

A free consultation with a personal injury lawyer can help you make an informed decision.

Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers ways to resolve personal injury cases without a trial. Common ADR methods include:

  • Mediation: A neutral mediator helps both sides reach a fair settlement. This method is less formal and quicker than a trial.
  • Arbitration: An arbitrator listens to both sides and issues a binding decision. Arbitration is faster and less costly than a court trial.
  • Settlement conferences: Both parties meet with a judge to negotiate a settlement before trial.

ADR methods can save time and reduce court costs while securing fair compensation for personal injury victims.

Settling vs. Trial: Find the Best Path to Your Recovery with Professional Guidance

Choosing between a personal injury settlement and a court trial depends on your goals and comfort level with risk. A settlement offers faster resolution and less stress, while a trial may lead to higher compensation if you have a strong case. To make the best choice for your situation, consult with the Recovery Law Center. Our experienced team will guide you through your options and help you pursue the outcome you deserve. Schedule a consultation today and take the first step toward your recovery.


Glenn T. Honda

For over 29 years, attorney Glenn Honda has helped people injured in accidents throughout Hawaii get the best outcome for their case, whether it’s maximizing their settlement, or balancing costs and risks vs. putting the whole experience behind them. As the founding attorney of the Recovery Law Center, he is passionate about helping his clients with their physical, emotional and financial recovery. Mr. Honda will fight to get you coverage for your medical bills, lost wages, damaged property and other costs related to your accident.

Our Awards

Recovery Law Center Injury & Accident Attorneys

Get Your Free Consultation